Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Omphalea oleifera | Hemsl. | 4 | documented |
| Omphalea ankaranensis | L.J.Gillespie | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Omphalea bracteata | (Blanco) Merr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Omphalea brasiliensis | Müll.Arg. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Omphalea celata | P.I.Forst. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Omphalea commutata | Müll.Arg. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Omphalea diandra | L. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Omphalea ekmanii | Alain | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Omphalea grandifolia | Merr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Omphalea hypoleuca | Griseb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Omphalea malayana | Merr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Omphalea mansfeldiana | Mildbr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Omphalea occidentalis | Leandri | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Omphalea oppositifolia | (Willd.) L.J.Gillespie | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Omphalea palmata | Leandri | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Omphalea papuana | Pax & K.Hoffm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Omphalea queenslandiae | F.M.Bailey | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Omphalea sargentii | Merr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Omphalea triandra | L. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Omphalea trichotoma | Müll.Arg. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.