Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nothaphoebe annamensis | A.Chev. ex H.Liu | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Nothaphoebe condensa | Ridl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Nothaphoebe coriacea | (Kosterm.) Kosterm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Nothaphoebe crassifolia | (Ridl.) Kosterm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Nothaphoebe elata | (Kosterm.) Kosterm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Nothaphoebe falcata | Blume | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Nothaphoebe foetida | (Kosterm.) Kosterm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Nothaphoebe gigaphylla | (Kosterm.) Kosterm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Nothaphoebe havilandii | Gamble | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Nothaphoebe helophila | (Kosterm.) Kosterm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Nothaphoebe heterophylla | Merr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Nothaphoebe kingiana | Gamble | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Nothaphoebe leytensis | (Elmer) Merr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Nothaphoebe macrocarpa | (Blume) Meisn. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Nothaphoebe magnifica | (Kosterm.) Kosterm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Nothaphoebe novoguineensis | Kaneh. & Hatus. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Nothaphoebe pachyphylla | Kosterm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Nothaphoebe pahangensis | Kosterm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Nothaphoebe sarawacensis | Gamble | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Nothaphoebe siamensis | Kosterm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Nothaphoebe umbelliflora | (Blume) Blume | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.