Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niedenzuella acutifolia | (Cav.) W.R.Anderson | 4 | documented |
| Niedenzuella glabra | (Spreng.) W.R.Anderson | 4 | documented |
| Niedenzuella caracasana | W.R.Anderson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Niedenzuella castanea | (Cuatrec.) W.R.Anderson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Niedenzuella doniana | (Griseb.) R.F.Almeida | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Niedenzuella lasiandra | (A.Juss.) R.F.Almeida | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Niedenzuella leucosepala | (Griseb.) W.R.Anderson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Niedenzuella lucida | (A.Juss.) W.R.Anderson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Niedenzuella mater-dei | (Cuatrec.) W.R.Anderson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Niedenzuella metensis | (Cuatrec.) W.R.Anderson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Niedenzuella mogoriifolia | (A.Juss.) W.R.Anderson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Niedenzuella multiglandulosa | (A.Juss.) W.R.Anderson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Niedenzuella peruviana | (Nied.) W.R.Anderson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Niedenzuella poeppigiana | (A.Juss.) W.R.Anderson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Niedenzuella sericea | (A.Juss.) W.R.Anderson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Niedenzuella stannea | (Griseb.) W.R.Anderson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Niedenzuella suaveolens | (A.Juss.) W.R.Anderson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Niedenzuella warmingiana | (Griseb.) W.R.Anderson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.