Nerine

Accepted species 27 Documented here 16 Family Amaryllidaceae

Accepted species 27 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Nerine humilis Herb. 127 documented
Nerine sarniensis (L.) Herb. 103 documented
Nerine pudica Hook.f. 28 documented
Nerine laticoma Dur. & Schinz 18 documented
Nerine laticoma (Ker Gawl.) T.Durand & Schinz 18 documented
Nerine undulata (L.) Herb. 15 documented
Nerine frithii L.Bolus 10 documented
Nerine appendiculata Baker 9 documented
Nerine angustifolia (Baker) W.Watson 8 documented
Nerine rehmannii L.Bolus 8 documented
Nerine bowdenii W.Watson 6 documented
Nerine filifolia Baker 6 documented
Nerine gaberonensis Bremek. & Oberm. 5 documented
Nerine krigei W.F.Barker 4 documented
Nerine pancratioides Baker 4 documented
Nerine platypetala G.McNeil 4 documented
Nerine gracilis R.A.Dyer 2 below the evidence gate
Nerine filamentosa W.F.Barker 0 below the evidence gate
Nerine gibsonii K.H.Douglas 0 below the evidence gate
Nerine hesseoides L.Bolus 0 below the evidence gate
Nerine macmasteri G.D.Duncan 0 below the evidence gate
Nerine marincowitzii Snijman 0 below the evidence gate
Nerine masoniorum L.Bolus 0 below the evidence gate
Nerine pusilla Dinter 0 below the evidence gate
Nerine ridleyi E.Phillips 0 below the evidence gate
Nerine transvaalensis L.Bolus 0 below the evidence gate
Nerine versicolor Herb. 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.