Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nama hispida | A.Gray | 441 | documented |
| Nama demissa | A.Gray | 208 | documented |
| Nama jamaicensis | L. | 166 | documented |
| Nama carnosa | (Wooton) C.L.Hitchc. | 64 | documented |
| Nama densa | Lemmon | 51 | documented |
| Nama dichotoma | (Ruiz & Pav.) Choisy | 51 | documented |
| Nama pusilla | Lemmon ex A.Gray | 39 | documented |
| Nama rothrockii | A.Gray | 39 | documented |
| Nama stenocarpa | A.Gray | 26 | documented |
| Nama lobbii | A.Gray | 25 | documented |
| Nama aretioides | (Hook. & Arn.) Brand | 24 | documented |
| Nama sandwicensis | A.Gray | 15 | documented |
| Nama sericea | Willd. ex Schult. | 11 | documented |
| Nama stevensii | C.L.Hitchc. | 10 | documented |
| Nama havardii | A.Gray | 9 | documented |
| Nama xylopoda | (Wooton & Standl.) C.L.Hitchc. | 9 | documented |
| Nama depressa | Lemmon ex A.Gray | 6 | documented |
| Nama origanifolia | Kunth | 6 | documented |
| Nama coulteri | A.Gray | 5 | documented |
| Nama torynophylla | Greenm. | 5 | documented |
| Nama hitchcockii | J.D.Bacon | 3 | documented |
| Nama undulata | Kunth | 3 | documented |
| Nama parviflora | (Greenm.) Constance | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Nama serpylloides | A.Gray | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Nama californica | (A.Gray) J.Bacon | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Nama linearis | D.L.Nash | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Nama retrorsa | J.T.Howell | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Nama affine | Kuntze | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Nama bartlettii | Standl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Nama biflora | Choisy | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Nama canescens | C.L.Hitchc. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Nama constancei | J.D.Bacon | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Nama cuatrocienegensis | G.L.Nesom | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Nama cubana | P.Wilson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Nama ehrenbergii | Brand | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Nama flavescens | Brandegee | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Nama hintoniorum | G.L.Nesom | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Nama hirsuta | M.Martens & Galeotti | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Nama johnstonii | C.L.Hitchc. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Nama macrantha | (Choisy) Brand | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Nama marshii | (Standl.) I.M.Johnst. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Nama orizabensis | D.L.Nash | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Nama ovata | (Nutt. ex Choisy) Britton | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Nama palmeri | A.Gray | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Nama parvifolia | (Torr.) Greenm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Nama propinqua | C.V.Morton & C.L.Hitchc. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Nama prostrata | Brand | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Nama quiexobrana | J.D.Bacon & J.A.McDonald | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Nama rotundifolia | (A.Gray) J.F.Macbr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Nama rzedowskii | J.D.Bacon | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Nama schaffneri | A.Gray | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Nama segetalis | Ricketson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Nama spathulata | Brandegee | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Nama spatulata | Brandegee | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Nama stenophylla | A.Gray | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Nama stewartii | I.M.Johnst. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Nama turneri | J.D.Bacon | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.