Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Myrosmodes nervosa | (Kraenzl.) Novoa, C.A.Vargas & Cisternas | 8 | documented |
| Myrosmodes paludosa | (Rchb.f.) P.Ortiz | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Myrosmodes breve | (Schltr.) Garay | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Myrosmodes brevis | (Schltr.) Garay | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Myrosmodes chiogena | (Schltr.) C.A.Vargas | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Myrosmodes cochleare | Garay | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Myrosmodes cochlearis | Garay | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Myrosmodes filamentosa | (Mansf.) Garay | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Myrosmodes filamentosum | (Mansf.) Garay | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Myrosmodes gymnandra | (Rchb.f.) C.A.Vargas | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Myrosmodes noemiae | Monsalvo, M.I.Sánchez & Fortunato | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Myrosmodes nubigenum | Rchb.f. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Myrosmodes reticulata | Szlach., Mytnik & S.Nowak | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Myrosmodes rhynchocarpa | (Schltr.) Garay | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Myrosmodes rhynchocarpum | (Schltr.) Garay | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Myrosmodes rostrata | (Rchb.f.) Garay | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Myrosmodes rostratum | (Rchb.f.) Garay | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Myrosmodes subnivalis | Szlach., Mytnik & S.Nowak | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Myrosmodes ustulatum | (Schltr.) Garay | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.