Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Myriocladus caburaiensis | Alfonso & P.L.Viana | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Myriocladus cardonae | Swallen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Myriocladus churunensis | Swallen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Myriocladus distantiflorus | Swallen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Myriocladus exsertus | Swallen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Myriocladus grandifolius | Swallen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Myriocladus involutus | Judz. & Davidse | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Myriocladus longiramosus | Swallen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Myriocladus neblinaensis | Swallen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Myriocladus paludicola | Swallen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Myriocladus simplex | Swallen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Myriocladus steyermarkii | Swallen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Myriocladus virgatus | Swallen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.