Moquiniastrum

Accepted species 20 Documented here 0 Family Asteraceae

Accepted species 20 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Moquiniastrum argyreum (Dusén ex Malme) G.Sancho 0 below the evidence gate
Moquiniastrum barrosoae (Cabrera) G.Sancho 0 below the evidence gate
Moquiniastrum blanchetianum (DC.) G.Sancho 0 below the evidence gate
Moquiniastrum cinereum (Hook. & Arn.) G.Sancho 0 below the evidence gate
Moquiniastrum cordatum (Less.) G.Sancho 0 below the evidence gate
Moquiniastrum densicephalum (Cabrera) G.Sancho 0 below the evidence gate
Moquiniastrum discolor (Baker) G.Sancho 0 below the evidence gate
Moquiniastrum floribundum (Cabrera) G.Sancho 0 below the evidence gate
Moquiniastrum gardneri (Baker) G.Sancho 0 below the evidence gate
Moquiniastrum glabrum Roque, Neves Ribeiro & A.M.Teles 0 below the evidence gate
Moquiniastrum hatschbachii (Baker) G.Sancho 0 below the evidence gate
Moquiniastrum haumanianum (Cabrera) G.Sancho 0 below the evidence gate
Moquiniastrum mollissimum (Malme) G.Sancho 0 below the evidence gate
Moquiniastrum oligocephalum (Gardner) G.Sancho 0 below the evidence gate
Moquiniastrum paniculatum (Less.) G.Sancho 0 below the evidence gate
Moquiniastrum polymorphum (Less.) G.Sancho 0 below the evidence gate
Moquiniastrum pulchrum (Cabrera) G.Sancho 0 below the evidence gate
Moquiniastrum ramboi (Cabrera) G.Sancho 0 below the evidence gate
Moquiniastrum sordidum (Less.) G.Sancho 0 below the evidence gate
Moquiniastrum velutinum (Bong.) G.Sancho 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.