Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Montiopsis gayana | (Barnéoud) D.I.Ford | 16 | documented |
| Montiopsis andicola | (Gillies) D.I.Ford | 14 | documented |
| Montiopsis umbellata | (Ruiz & Pav.) D.I.Ford | 6 | documented |
| Montiopsis gilliesii | (Hook. & Arn.) D.I.Ford | 5 | documented |
| Montiopsis sericea | (Hook. & Arn.) D.I.Ford | 3 | documented |
| Montiopsis capitata | (Hook. & Arn.) D.I.Ford | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Montiopsis berteroana | (Phil.) D.I.Ford | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Montiopsis cistiflora | (Gillies ex Arn.) D.I.Ford | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Montiopsis copiapina | (Phil.) D.I.Ford | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Montiopsis cumingii | (Hook. & Arn.) D.I.Ford | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Montiopsis demissa | (Phil.) D.I.Ford | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Montiopsis glomerata | (Phil.) D.I.Ford | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Montiopsis modesta | (Phil.) D.I.Ford | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Montiopsis parviflora | (Phil.) D.I.Ford | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Montiopsis polycarpoides | (Phil.) Peralta | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Montiopsis potentilloides | (Barnéoud) D.I.Ford | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Montiopsis ramosissima | (Hook. & Arn.) D.I.Ford | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Montiopsis trifida | (Hook. & Arn.) D.I.Ford | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.