Monopyle

Accepted species 25 Documented here 4 Family Gesneriaceae

Accepted species 25 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Monopyle maxonii C.V.Morton 27 documented
Monopyle puberula C.V.Morton 8 documented
Monopyle ecuadorensis C.V.Morton 6 documented
Monopyle paniculata Benth. 3 documented
Monopyle macrocarpa Benth. 2 below the evidence gate
Monopyle aurea Keene & J.L.Clark 1 below the evidence gate
Monopyle angustifolia Fritsch 0 below the evidence gate
Monopyle chocoensis Keene & J.L.Clark 0 below the evidence gate
Monopyle connata J.L.Clark & Keene 0 below the evidence gate
Monopyle flava L.E.Skog 0 below the evidence gate
Monopyle glutinosa J.L.Clark & Keene 0 below the evidence gate
Monopyle grandiflora Wiehler 0 below the evidence gate
Monopyle inaequalis C.V.Morton 0 below the evidence gate
Monopyle iserniana Cuatrec. 0 below the evidence gate
Monopyle lilacina (Lem.) L.E.Skog, Barrie & Boggan 0 below the evidence gate
Monopyle longicarpa J.L.Clark & Keene 0 below the evidence gate
Monopyle mexiae C.V.Morton 0 below the evidence gate
Monopyle multiflora Keene & J.L.Clark 0 below the evidence gate
Monopyle panamensis C.V.Morton 0 below the evidence gate
Monopyle reflexa (Rusby) Roalson & Boggan 0 below the evidence gate
Monopyle sodiroana Fritsch 0 below the evidence gate
Monopyle stenoloba C.V.Morton 0 below the evidence gate
Monopyle subdimidiata (Klotzsch & Hanst.) Mansf. 0 below the evidence gate
Monopyle subsessilis Benth. 0 below the evidence gate
Monopyle uniflora J.L.Clark & Keene 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.