Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monanthes laxiflora | (DC.) Bolle | 21 | documented |
| Monanthes brachycaulos | (Webb & Berthel.) Lowe | 13 | documented |
| Monanthes pallens | (Webb ex Christ) Christ | 5 | documented |
| Monanthes polyphylla | Haw. | 5 | documented |
| Monanthes anagensis | Praeger | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Monanthes × burchardii | Bramwell & G.D.Rowley | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Monanthes × filifolia | Bañares | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Monanthes × subglabrata | Bañares | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Monanthes atlantica | Ball | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Monanthes dasyphylla | Svent. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Monanthes icterica | (Webb ex Bolle) Praeger | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Monanthes lowei | (Paiva) P.Pérez & Acebes | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Monanthes minima | (Bolle) Christ | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Monanthes muralis | Hook.f. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Monanthes niphophila | Svent. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Monanthes praegeri | Bramwell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Monanthes purpurascens | Christ | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Monanthes silensis | (Praeger) Svent. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Monanthes subcrassicaulis | (Kuntze) Praeger | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Monanthes subrosulata | Bañares & A.Acev.-Rodr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Monanthes tilophila | Christ | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Monanthes wildpretii | Bañares & S.Scholz | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.