Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Miscanthus sinensis | Andersson | 627 | documented |
| Miscanthus nepalensis | (Trin.) Hack. | 55 | documented |
| Miscanthus sacchariflorus | (Maxim.) Benth. & Hook.f. ex Franch. | 38 | documented |
| Miscanthus sacchariflorus | (Maxim.) Hack. | 38 | documented |
| Miscanthus floridulus | (Labill.) Warb. ex K.Schum. & Lauterb. | 31 | documented |
| Miscanthus ecklonii | (Nees) Mabb. | 17 | documented |
| Miscanthus depauperatus | Merr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Miscanthus erectus | Gibbs.-Russ. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Miscanthus fuscus | (Roxb.) Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Miscanthus longiberbis | (Hack.) Nakai | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Miscanthus lutarioriparius | L.Liu ex S.L.Chen & Renvoize | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Miscanthus nudipes | (Griseb.) Hack. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Miscanthus oligostachyus | Stapf | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Miscanthus paniculatus | (B.S.Sun) S.L.Chen & Renvoize | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Miscanthus tinctorius | (Steud.) Hack. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Miscanthus villosus | Y.C.Liu & H.Peng | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Miscanthus wangpicheonensis | T.I.Heo & J.S.Kim | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.