Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minthostachys mollis | (Benth.) Griseb. | 12 | documented |
| Minthostachys verticillata | (Griseb.) Epling | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Minthostachys acris | Schmidt-Leb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Minthostachys acutifolia | Epling | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Minthostachys andina | (Britton ex Rusby) Epling | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Minthostachys diffusa | Epling | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Minthostachys dimorpha | Schmidt-Leb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Minthostachys elongata | Schmidt-Leb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Minthostachys fusca | Schmidt-Leb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Minthostachys glabrescens | (Benth.) Epling | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Minthostachys latifolia | Schmidt-Leb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Minthostachys ovata | (Briq.) Epling | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Minthostachys rubra | Schmidt-Leb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Minthostachys salicifolia | Epling | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Minthostachys septentrionalis | Schmidt-Leb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Minthostachys setosa | (Briq.) Epling | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Minthostachys spicata | (Benth.) Epling | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.