Microtoena

Accepted species 19 Documented here 0 Family Lamiaceae

Accepted species 19 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Microtoena albescens C.Y.Wu & S.J.Hsuan 0 below the evidence gate
Microtoena brevipedunculata (C.Y.Wu & S.J.Hsuan) Q.Wang 0 below the evidence gate
Microtoena delavayi Prain 0 below the evidence gate
Microtoena esquirolii H.Lév. 0 below the evidence gate
Microtoena insuavis (Hance) Prain ex Briq. 0 below the evidence gate
Microtoena megacalyx C.Y.Wu 0 below the evidence gate
Microtoena miyiensis C.Y.Wu & H.W.Li 0 below the evidence gate
Microtoena mollis H.Lév. 0 below the evidence gate
Microtoena moupinensis (Franch.) Prain 0 below the evidence gate
Microtoena muliensis C.Y.Wu 0 below the evidence gate
Microtoena nepalensis Stearn 0 below the evidence gate
Microtoena omeiensis C.Y.Wu & S.J.Hsuan 0 below the evidence gate
Microtoena patchoulii (C.B.Clarke ex Hook.f.) C.Y.Wu & S.J.Hsuan 0 below the evidence gate
Microtoena praineana Diels 0 below the evidence gate
Microtoena robusta Hemsl. 0 below the evidence gate
Microtoena stenocalyx C.Y.Wu & S.J.Hsuan 0 below the evidence gate
Microtoena urticifolia Hemsl. 0 below the evidence gate
Microtoena vanchingshanensis C.Y.Wu & S.J.Hsuan 0 below the evidence gate
Microtoena wardii Stearn 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.