Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Micropterygium angustistipulum | Spruce | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Micropterygium bialatum | Fulford | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Micropterygium bolivarense | Fulford | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Micropterygium campanense | Spruce ex Reimers | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Micropterygium carinatum | (Grev.) Reimers | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Micropterygium conchifolium | Reimers | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Micropterygium duidae | Reimers | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Micropterygium grandistipulum | Steph. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Micropterygium laeve | H.Rob. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Micropterygium lechleri | Reimers | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Micropterygium leiophyllum | Spruce | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Micropterygium longicellulatum | Uribe & E.L.Linares | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Micropterygium parvistipulum | Spruce | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Micropterygium pterygophyllum | (Nees) Trevis. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Micropterygium reimersianum | Herzog | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Micropterygium steyermarkii | Fulford | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Micropterygium tatei | Reimers | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Micropterygium tenax | (Steph.) Grolle | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Micropterygium trachyphyllum | Reimers | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Micropterygium tumidulum | Fulford | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.