Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Microbryum davallianum | (Sm.) R.H.Zander | 25 | documented |
| Microbryum curvicollum | (Hedw.) R.H.Zander | 17 | documented |
| Microbryum starckeanum | (Hedw.) R.H.Zander | 12 | documented |
| Microbryum rectum | (With.) R.H.Zander | 10 | documented |
| Microbryum floerkeanum | (F.Weber & D.Mohr) Schimp. | 7 | documented |
| Microbryum commutatum | (Limpr.) Cl.Schneid., Th.Schneid. & Mahévas | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Microbryum conicum | (Schleich. ex Schwägr.) Cl.Schneid., Th.Schneid. & Mahévas | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Microbryum fosbergii | (E.B.Bartram) Ros, O.Werner & Rams | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Microbryum longipes | (J.Guerra, J.J.Martínez & Ros) R.H.Zander | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Microbryum lydiae | Otnyukova | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Microbryum muticum | (Venturi) Cl.Schneid., Th.Schneid. & Mahévas | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Microbryum raddei | (Broth.) R.H.Zander | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Microbryum rufochaete | (Magill) R.H.Zander | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Microbryum subplanomarginatum | (Dixon) R.H.Zander | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Microbryum tasmanicum | (Dixon & Rodway) R.H.Zander | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.