Mezoneuron

Accepted species 23 Documented here 3 Family Fabaceae

Accepted species 23 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Mezoneuron cucullatum (Roxb.) Wight & Arn. 25 documented
Mezoneuron scortechinii F.Muell. 21 documented
Mezoneuron latisiliquum (Cav.) Merr. 13 documented
Mezoneuron sumatranum (Roxb.) Wight & Arn. ex Voigt 2 below the evidence gate
Mezoneuron pubescens Desf. 1 below the evidence gate
Mezoneuron andamanicum Prain 0 below the evidence gate
Mezoneuron angolense Welw. ex Oliv. 0 below the evidence gate
Mezoneuron baudouinii Guillaumin 0 below the evidence gate
Mezoneuron benthamianum Baill. 0 below the evidence gate
Mezoneuron brachycarpon Benth. 0 below the evidence gate
Mezoneuron enneaphyllum (Roxb.) Wight & Arn. ex Voigt 0 below the evidence gate
Mezoneuron erythrocarpum (Pedley) R.Clark & Gagnon 0 below the evidence gate
Mezoneuron furfuraceum Prain 0 below the evidence gate
Mezoneuron hildebrandtii Vatke 0 below the evidence gate
Mezoneuron hymenocarpum Wight & Arn. ex Prain 0 below the evidence gate
Mezoneuron kauaiense (H.Mann) Hillebr. 0 below the evidence gate
Mezoneuron mindorense Merr. 0 below the evidence gate
Mezoneuron montrouzieri Guillaumin 0 below the evidence gate
Mezoneuron nhatrangense Gagnep. 0 below the evidence gate
Mezoneuron nitens (F.Muell. ex Benth.) R.Clark & Gagnon 0 below the evidence gate
Mezoneuron ouenense (Guillaumin) R.Clark 0 below the evidence gate
Mezoneuron rubiginosum (Guillaumin) R.Clark 0 below the evidence gate
Mezoneuron schlechteri (Harms) R.Clark 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.