Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Melodinus australis | (F.Muell.) Pierre | 199 | documented |
| Melodinus acutiflorus | F.Muell. | 28 | documented |
| Melodinus orientalis | Blume | 10 | documented |
| Melodinus fusiformis | Champ. ex Benth. | 4 | documented |
| Melodinus cochinchinensis | (Lour.) Merr. | 20 | below the evidence gate |
| Melodinus aeneus | Baill. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Melodinus angustifolius | Hayata | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Melodinus axillaris | W.T.Wang | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Melodinus balansae | Baill. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Melodinus baueri | Endl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Melodinus cambodiensis | Pierre | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Melodinus cumingii | A.DC. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Melodinus densistriatus | Markgr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Melodinus erianthus | Pit. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Melodinus forbesii | Fawc. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Melodinus glaber | Turrill | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Melodinus honbaensis | A.Chev. ex Pit. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Melodinus insularis | (Markgr.) Fosberg | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Melodinus philippensis | A.DC. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Melodinus philliraeoides | Labill. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Melodinus reticulatus | Boiteau | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Melodinus scandens | J.R.Forst. & G.Forst. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Melodinus tenuicaudatus | Tsiang & P.T.Li | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Melodinus vitiensis | Rolfe | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.