Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Medicosma fareana | (F.Muell.) T.G.Hartley | 6 | documented |
| Medicosma articulata | T.G.Hartley | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Medicosma congesta | T.G.Hartley | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Medicosma cunnighamii | (Hook.) Benth. & Hook.f. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Medicosma diversifolia | T.G.Hartley | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Medicosma elliptica | T.G.Hartley | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Medicosma emarginata | T.G.Hartley | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Medicosma exigua | T.G.Hartley | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Medicosma forsteri | T.G.Hartley | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Medicosma glandulosa | T.G.Hartley | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Medicosma gracilis | T.G.Hartley | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Medicosma heterophylla | T.G.Hartley | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Medicosma latifolia | T.G.Hartley | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Medicosma leratii | (Guillaumin) T.G.Hartley | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Medicosma mulgraveana | T.G.Hartley | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Medicosma obliqua | T.G.Hartley | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Medicosma obovata | T.G.Hartley | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Medicosma parvifolia | T.G.Hartley | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Medicosma petiolaris | T.G.Hartley | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Medicosma riparia | (P.Royen) T.G.Hartley | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Medicosma sessiliflora | (C.T.White) T.G.Hartley | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Medicosma suberosa | T.G.Hartley | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Medicosma subsessilis | T.G.Hartley | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Medicosma tahafeana | T.G.Hartley | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Medicosma verticillata | T.G.Hartley | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.