Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Matucana aurantiaca | (Vaupel) Buxb. | 18 | documented |
| Matucana aureiflora | F.Ritter | 7 | documented |
| Matucana formosa | F.Ritter | 4 | documented |
| Matucana haynei | (Otto ex Salm-Dyck) Britton & Rose | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Matucana hoxeyi | (G.J.Charles) G.J.Charles | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Matucana huagalensis | (Donald & A.B.Lau) Bregman, Meerst., Melis & A.B.Pullen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Matucana intertexta | F.Ritter | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Matucana klopfensteinii | Cieza & Pino | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Matucana krahnii | (Donald) Bregmann | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Matucana madisoniorum | (Hutchison) G.D.Rowley | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Matucana oreodoxa | (F.Ritter) Slaba | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Matucana paucicostata | F.Ritter | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Matucana pujupatii | (Donald & A.B.Lau) Bregmann | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Matucana rebutiiflora | G.J.Charles | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Matucana ritteri | Buining | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Matucana roseoalba | Hort. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Matucana tuberculata | (Donald) Bregman, Meerst., Melis & A.B.Pullen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Matucana weberbaueri | (Vaupel) Backeb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.