Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mastixia arborea | (Wight) C.B.Clarke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Mastixia caudatilimba | C.Y.Wu ex Soong | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Mastixia congylos | Kosterm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Mastixia cuspidata | Blume | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Mastixia eugenioides | K.M.Matthew | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Mastixia euonymoides | Prain | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Mastixia glauca | K.M.Matthew | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Mastixia hongiaoensis | Tagane & T.Q.Cuong | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Mastixia kaniensis | Melch. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Mastixia macrocarpa | K.M.Matthew | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Mastixia microcarpa | Y.C.Liu & H.Peng | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Mastixia montana | Kosterm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Mastixia nimalii | Kosterm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Mastixia octandra | K.M.Matthew | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Mastixia parviflora | H.Zhu | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Mastixia pentandra | Blume | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Mastixia rostrata | Blume | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Mastixia tetrandra | (Wight ex Thwaites) C.B.Clarke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Mastixia tetrapetala | Merr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Mastixia trichophylla | W.P.Fang ex Soong | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Mastixia trichotoma | Blume | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.