Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marcgraviastrum apaporensis | de Roon & Bedell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Marcgraviastrum cuneifolium | (Gardner) Bedell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Marcgraviastrum delpinianum | (Wittm.) Gir.-Cañas | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Marcgraviastrum elegans | de Roon & Bedell ex Gir.-Cañas & S.Dressler | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Marcgraviastrum gigantophyllum | (Gilg) Bedell ex S.Dressler | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Marcgraviastrum glossostipum | de Roon & Bedell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Marcgraviastrum grandiflorum | de Roon & Bedell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Marcgraviastrum macrocarpum | (G.Don) Bedell ex S.Dressler | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Marcgraviastrum mixtum | (Triana & Planch.) Bedell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Marcgraviastrum obovatum | (G.Don) Bedell ex Gir.-Cañas & S.Dressler | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Marcgraviastrum pauciflorum | de Roon & Bedell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Marcgraviastrum pendulum | (Lanj. & Heerdt) Bedell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Marcgraviastrum sodiroi | (Gilg) Bedell ex S.Dressler | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Marcgraviastrum subsessile | (Benth.) Bedell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Marcgraviastrum vogelii | de Roon & Bedell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.