Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maihueniopsis darwinii | (Hensl.) F.Ritter | 24 | documented |
| Maihueniopsis glomerata | (Haw.) R.Kiesling | 22 | documented |
| Maihueniopsis ovata | (Pfeiff.) F.Ritter | 17 | documented |
| Maihueniopsis molfinoi | Speg. | 14 | documented |
| Maihueniopsis camachoi | (Espinosa) F.Ritter | 11 | documented |
| Maihueniopsis hickenii | (Britton & Rose) D.R.Hunt | 10 | documented |
| Maihueniopsis platyacantha | (Pfeiff.) D.R.Hunt | 8 | documented |
| Maihueniopsis clavarioides | (Otto ex Pfeiff.) E.F.Anderson | 7 | documented |
| Maihueniopsis archiconoidea | F.Ritter | 6 | documented |
| Maihueniopsis grandiflora | F.Ritter | 4 | documented |
| Maihueniopsis wagenknechtii | F.Ritter | 4 | documented |
| Maihueniopsis crassispina | F.Ritter | 3 | documented |
| Maihueniopsis atacamensis | (Phil.) F.Ritter | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Maihueniopsis colorea | (F.Ritter) F.Ritter | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Maihueniopsis conoidea | (F.Ritter ex Backeb.) F.Ritter | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Maihueniopsis domeykoensis | F.Ritter | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Maihueniopsis glochidiata | G.J.Charles | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Maihueniopsis leoncito | (Werderm.) F.Ritter ex P.C.Guerrero & Helmut Walter | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Maihueniopsis minuta | (Backeb.) R.Kiesling | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Maihueniopsis reicheana | (Espinosa) D.R.Hunt | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.