Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Macairea lasiophylla | (Benth.) Wurdack | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Macairea axilliflora | Wurdack | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Macairea cardonae | Wurdack | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Macairea chimantensis | Wurdack | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Macairea cuieirasii | S.S.Renner | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Macairea duidae | Gleason | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Macairea lanata | Gleason | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Macairea linearis | Gleason | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Macairea maroana | Wurdack | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Macairea multinervia | Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Macairea neblinae | Wurdack | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Macairea pachyphylla | Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Macairea parviflora | Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Macairea parvifolia | Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Macairea philipsonii | S.S.Renner | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Macairea radula | DC. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Macairea rigida | Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Macairea rotundifolia | Cogn. & Hoehne | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Macairea rufescens | DC. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Macairea spruceana | O.Berg ex Triana | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Macairea stylosa | Triana | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Macairea sulcata | Triana | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Macairea theresiae | Cogn. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Macairea thyrsiflora | DC. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.