Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Luxemburgia angustifolia | Planch. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Luxemburgia bracteata | Dwyer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Luxemburgia ciliatibracteata | Sastre | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Luxemburgia ciliosa | (Mart.) Gardner | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Luxemburgia corymbosa | A.St.-Hil. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Luxemburgia damazioana | Beauverd | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Luxemburgia diciliata | Dwyer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Luxemburgia flexuosa | Sastre | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Luxemburgia furnensis | Feres | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Luxemburgia glazoviana | Beauverd | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Luxemburgia hatschbachiana | Sastre | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Luxemburgia leitonii | Feres | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Luxemburgia macedoi | Dwyer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Luxemburgia mogolensis | Feres | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Luxemburgia mysteriosa | Fraga & Feres | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Luxemburgia nobilis | Eichler ex Engl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Luxemburgia octandra | A.St.-Hil. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Luxemburgia polyandra | A.St.-Hil. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Luxemburgia schwackeana | Taub. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Luxemburgia speciosa | A.St.-Hil. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.