Ludia

Accepted species 25 Documented here 0 Family Salicaceae

Accepted species 25 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Ludia ankaranensis Capuron & Sleumer 0 below the evidence gate
Ludia antanosarum Capuron & Sleumer 0 below the evidence gate
Ludia arborea H.Perrier 0 below the evidence gate
Ludia boinensis H.Perrier 0 below the evidence gate
Ludia brevipes Sleumer 0 below the evidence gate
Ludia chapelieri Sleumer 0 below the evidence gate
Ludia comorensis H.Perrier 0 below the evidence gate
Ludia craggiana Z.S.Rogers, Randrian. & J.S.Mill. 0 below the evidence gate
Ludia dracaenoides H.Perrier 0 below the evidence gate
Ludia erosifolia Sleumer 0 below the evidence gate
Ludia faradifani Capuron & Sleumer 0 below the evidence gate
Ludia glaucocarpa Capuron & Sleumer 0 below the evidence gate
Ludia ikongoensis Capuron & Sleumer 0 below the evidence gate
Ludia imontiensis Capuron & Sleumer 0 below the evidence gate
Ludia leandriana Sleumer 0 below the evidence gate
Ludia ludiifolia (H.Perrier) Capuron & Sleumer 0 below the evidence gate
Ludia madagascariensis Clos 0 below the evidence gate
Ludia mauritiana J.F.Gmel. 0 below the evidence gate
Ludia myrtoides Capuron & Sleumer 0 below the evidence gate
Ludia pachyadenia Sleumer 0 below the evidence gate
Ludia pinnatinervia (H.Perrier) Capuron & Sleumer 0 below the evidence gate
Ludia scolopioides Capuron & Sleumer 0 below the evidence gate
Ludia sessilis Sleumer 0 below the evidence gate
Ludia suarezensis Capuron & Sleumer 0 below the evidence gate
Ludia wikstroemiifolia Sleumer 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.