Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Loxocarpus angustifolius | Ridl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Loxocarpus argenteus | B.L.Burtt | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Loxocarpus burttii | T.L.Yao | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Loxocarpus caeruleus | (Ridl.) Ridl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Loxocarpus caulescens | B.L.Burtt | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Loxocarpus conicapsularis | (C.B.Clarke) B.L.Burtt | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Loxocarpus coodei | (B.L.Burtt) T.L.Yao | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Loxocarpus holttumii | M.R.Hend. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Loxocarpus incanus | R.Br. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Loxocarpus littoralis | T.L.Yao | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Loxocarpus meijeri | B.L.Burtt | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Loxocarpus papillosus | M.R.Hend. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Loxocarpus pauzii | T.L.Yao | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Loxocarpus repens | B.L.Burtt | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Loxocarpus rufescens | (C.B.Clarke) B.L.Burtt | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Loxocarpus segelamensis | T.L.Yao | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Loxocarpus semitortus | (C.B.Clarke) Ridl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Loxocarpus sericeus | (Ridl.) B.L.Burtt | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Loxocarpus sericiflavus | (Kiew & Banka) T.L.Yao | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Loxocarpus stapfii | (Kraenzl.) B.L.Burtt | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Loxocarpus taeniophyllus | (B.L.Burtt) T.L.Yao | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Loxocarpus tunkui | Kiew | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Loxocarpus verbeniflos | (C.B.Clarke) B.L.Burtt | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Loxocarpus violoides | (C.B.Clarke) T.L.Yao | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.