Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Loricaria antisanensis | Cuatrec. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Loricaria azuayensis | Cuatrec. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Loricaria cinerea | D.J.N.Hind | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Loricaria colombiana | Cuatrec. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Loricaria complanata | Wedd. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Loricaria ferruginea | Wedd. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Loricaria graveolens | Wedd. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Loricaria ilinissae | (Benth.) Cuatrec. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Loricaria lagunillensis | Cuatrec. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Loricaria leptothamna | (Mattf.) Cuatrec. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Loricaria lycopodinea | Cuatrec. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Loricaria macbridei | Cuatrec. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Loricaria ollgaardii | M.O.Dillon & Sagást. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Loricaria pauciflora | Cuatrec. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Loricaria puracensis | Cuatrec. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Loricaria scolopendra | (Hook.) Kuntze | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Loricaria thujoides | (Lam.) Sch.Bip. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Loricaria thuyoides | (Lam.) Sch.Bip. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Loricaria thyrsoidea | (Cuatrec.) M.O.Dillon & Sagást. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Loricaria unduaviensis | Cuatrec. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.