Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lophopetalum wightianum | Arn. | 67 | documented |
| Lophopetalum arnhemicum | Byrnes | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lophopetalum beccarianum | Pierre | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lophopetalum duperreanum | Pierre | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lophopetalum floribundum | Wight | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lophopetalum glabrum | Ding Hou | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lophopetalum javanicum | (Zoll.) Turcz. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lophopetalum ledermannii | (Loes.) Ding Hou | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lophopetalum littorale | Kurz | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lophopetalum macranthum | (Loes.) Ding Hou | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lophopetalum micranthum | Loes. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lophopetalum multinervium | Ridl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lophopetalum pachyphyllum | King | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lophopetalum pallidum | M.A.Lawson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lophopetalum rigidum | Ridl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lophopetalum sessilifolium | Ridl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lophopetalum subobovatum | King | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lophopetalum tanahgambut | Randi, Utteridge & Wijedasa | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lophopetalum torricellense | Loes. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lophopetalum wallichii | Kurz | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.