Lomariopsis

Accepted species 54 Documented here 3 Family Lomariopsidaceae

Accepted species 54 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Lomariopsis vestita Fourn. 13 documented
Lomariopsis boninensis Nakai 9 documented
Lomariopsis novae-caledoniae Mett 3 documented
Lomariopsis japurensis (C.Martius) J.Sm. 1 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis × farrarii R.C.Moran & J.E.Watkins 0 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis amydrophlebia (Sloss. ex Maxon) Holttum 0 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis boivinii Holttum 0 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis brackenridgei Carruth. 0 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis chinensis Ching 0 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis christensenii Rakotondr. 0 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis commersonii Rakotondr. 0 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis congoensis Holttum 0 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis cordata (Bonap.) Alston 0 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis crassifolia Holttum 0 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis decrescens (Baker) Kuhn 0 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis fendleri D.C.Eaton 0 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis guineensis (Underw.) Alston 0 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis hederacea Alston 0 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis holttumii Rakotondr. 0 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis intermedia Holttum 0 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis jamaicensis (Underw.) Holttum 0 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis kingii Holttum 0 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis kunzeana (Underw.) Holttum 0 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis latipinna Stolze 0 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis leptocarpa Fée 0 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis lineata (C.Presl) Holttum 0 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis longicaudata (Bonap.) Holttum 0 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis longini L.Y.Kuo & Y.H.Wu 0 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis madagascarica (Bonap.) Alston 0 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis mannii (Underw.) Alston 0 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis marginata Kuhn & Decken 0 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis mauritiensis Lorence 0 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis maxonii (Underw.) Holttum 0 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis mexicana Holttum 0 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis moorei L.Y.Kuo & Y.H.Wu 0 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis muriculata Holttum 0 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis nigropaleata Holttum 0 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis oleandrifolia (Brack.) Mett. ex Kuhn 0 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis palustris (Hook.) Mett. 0 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis palustris Mett. ex Kuhn 0 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis pervillei Mett. ex Kuhn 0 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis pollicina (P.Willemet) Mett. ex Kuhn 0 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis prieuriana Fée 0 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis pteridiformis (Ces.) Christenh. 0 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis recurvata Fée 0 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis rossii Holttum 0 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis salicifolia (Kunze) Lellinger 0 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis sorbifolia (L.) Fée 0 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis spectabilis Mett. 0 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis subtrifoliata Holttum 0 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis underwoodii Holttum 0 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis variabilis (Willd.) Fée 0 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis warneckei (Hieron.) Alston 0 below the evidence gate
Lomariopsis wrightii Mett.; Eat. 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.