Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Logania albiflora | (Andrews) Druce | 49 | documented |
| Logania crassifolia | R.Br. | 11 | documented |
| Logania ovata | R.Br. | 11 | documented |
| Logania recurva | J.M.Black | 8 | documented |
| Logania linifolia | Schltdl. | 5 | documented |
| Logania vaginalis | (Labill.) F.Muell. | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Logania archeri | B.J.Conn | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Logania buxifolia | F.Muell. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Logania cordifolia | Hook. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Logania depressa | Hook.f. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Logania diffusa | R.J.F.Hend. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Logania fasciculata | R.Br. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Logania granitica | A.J.Whalen & B.J.Conn | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Logania insularis | J.M.Black | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Logania litoralis | B.J.Conn | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Logania micrantha | Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Logania minor | (J.M.Black) B.J.Conn | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Logania nanophylla | B.J.Conn | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Logania perryana | B.J.Conn | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Logania saxatilis | G.Perry ex B.J.Conn | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Logania scabrella | B.J.Conn | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Logania stenophylla | F.Muell. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Logania sylvicola | Cranfield, Hislop & T.D.Macfarl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.