Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lindbergia brachyptera | (Mitt.) Kindb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lindbergia brevifolia | C.Gao | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lindbergia dagestanica | Ignatova & Ignatov | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lindbergia geniculata | (Laz.) Ignatova & Ignatov | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lindbergia grandiretis | (Lindb. ex Broth.) Ignatov & Ignatova | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lindbergia haplocladioides | Dixon | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lindbergia japonica | Cardot | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lindbergia koelzii | R.S.Williams | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lindbergia longinervis | Cardot & Dixon | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lindbergia maritima | Lewinsky | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lindbergia mexicana | (Besch.) Cardot | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lindbergia ovata | Thér. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lindbergia patentifolia | Dixon | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lindbergia pellicula | (Müll.Hal.) W.R.Buck & Schiavone | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lindbergia pseudoleskeoides | Dixon | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lindbergia serrulata | C.Gao, T.Cao & W.H.Wang | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lindbergia sinensis | (Müll.Hal.) Broth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lindbergia viridis | Dixon | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.