Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Limeum africanum | L. | 74 | documented |
| Limeum aethiopicum | Burm.f. | 65 | documented |
| Limeum viscosum | Fenzl | 24 | documented |
| Limeum telephioides | E.Mey. ex Fenzl | 14 | documented |
| Limeum sulcatum | (Klotzsch) Hutch. | 8 | documented |
| Limeum myosotis | H.Walter | 7 | documented |
| Limeum dinteri | G.Schellenb. | 5 | documented |
| Limeum fenestratum | (Fenzl) Heimerl | 5 | documented |
| Limeum subnudum | Friedrich | 5 | documented |
| Limeum argute-carinatum | Wawra | 3 | documented |
| Limeum angustifolium | Verdc. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Limeum arabicum | Friedrich | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Limeum arenicolum | G.Schellenb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Limeum deserticolum | Dinter & G.Schellenb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Limeum diffusum | (J.Gay) Schinz | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Limeum fruticosum | Verdc. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Limeum humifusum | Friedrich | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Limeum humile | Forssk. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Limeum katangense | Hauman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Limeum madagascariense | Sukhor. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Limeum obovatum | Vicary | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Limeum pauciflorum | Moq. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Limeum praetermissum | C.Jeffrey | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Limeum pterocarpum | (J.Gay) Heimerl | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Limeum rhombifolium | G.Schellenb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.