Ligusticopsis

Accepted species 19 Documented here 0 Family Apiaceae

Accepted species 19 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Ligusticopsis acaulis (R.H.Shan & M.L.Sheh) Pimenov 0 below the evidence gate
Ligusticopsis angelicifolia (Franch.) Leute 0 below the evidence gate
Ligusticopsis brachyloba (Franch.) Leute 0 below the evidence gate
Ligusticopsis capillacea (H.Wolff) Leute 0 below the evidence gate
Ligusticopsis daucoides (Franch.) Lavrova ex Pimenov & Kljuykov 0 below the evidence gate
Ligusticopsis deqenensis (R.H.Shan & Z.H.Pan) Pimenov 0 below the evidence gate
Ligusticopsis hispida (Franch.) Lavrova & Kljuykov 0 below the evidence gate
Ligusticopsis involucrata (Franch.) Lavrova 0 below the evidence gate
Ligusticopsis likiangensis (H.Wolff) Lavrova & Kljuykov 0 below the evidence gate
Ligusticopsis longiloba (H.Wolff) Leute 0 below the evidence gate
Ligusticopsis miyiensis J.Q.Lei & X.J.He 0 below the evidence gate
Ligusticopsis multivittata (Franch.) Leute 0 below the evidence gate
Ligusticopsis pseudodaucoides (H.Peng & Yin Z.Wang) Pimenov & Kljuykov 0 below the evidence gate
Ligusticopsis pubescens (Hand.-Mazz.) J.J.Deng, C.K.Liu & X.J.He 0 below the evidence gate
Ligusticopsis purpurascens Lavrova & Kljuykov 0 below the evidence gate
Ligusticopsis rechingeriana Leute 0 below the evidence gate
Ligusticopsis scapiformis (H.Wolff) Leute 0 below the evidence gate
Ligusticopsis wallichiana (DC.) Pimenov & Kljuykov 0 below the evidence gate
Ligusticopsis xizangensis (Z.H.Pan & M.L.Sheh) Pimenov & Kljuykov 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.