Leuzea

Accepted species 25 Documented here 5 Family Asteraceae

Accepted species 25 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Leuzea conifera DC. 154 documented
Leuzea uniflora (L.) Holub 51 documented
Leuzea carthamoides (Willd.) DC. 36 documented
Leuzea acaulis (L.) Holub 18 documented
Leuzea centauroides (L.) Holub 6 documented
Leuzea longifolia Hoffmanns. & Link 2 below the evidence gate
Leuzea rhapontica (L.) Holub 2 below the evidence gate
Leuzea exaltata Cutanda ex Willk. 1 below the evidence gate
Leuzea altaica (Fisch. ex Spreng.) Link 0 below the evidence gate
Leuzea aulieatensis (Iljin) Holub 0 below the evidence gate
Leuzea australis Gaudich. 0 below the evidence gate
Leuzea berardioides Batt. 0 below the evidence gate
Leuzea berardioides Coss. 0 below the evidence gate
Leuzea caulescens (Coss. & Balansa) Holub 0 below the evidence gate
Leuzea cynaroides Font Quer 0 below the evidence gate
Leuzea cynaroides (C.Sm.) Font Quer ex G.López 0 below the evidence gate
Leuzea insignis (Boiss.) Holub 0 below the evidence gate
Leuzea integrifolia (C.Winkl.) Holub 0 below the evidence gate
Leuzea karatavica (Regel & Schmalh.) Holub 0 below the evidence gate
Leuzea lyrata (C.Winkl. ex Iljin) Holub 0 below the evidence gate
Leuzea namanganica (Iljin) Holub 0 below the evidence gate
Leuzea nana (Lipsky) Holub 0 below the evidence gate
Leuzea nitida (Fisch.) Holub 0 below the evidence gate
Leuzea pulchra (Fisch. & C.A.Mey.) Holub 0 below the evidence gate
Leuzea pusilla Spreng. 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.