Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leucothoe fontanesiana | (Steud.) Sleumer | 223 | documented |
| Leucothoe axillaris | (Lam.) D.Don | 109 | documented |
| Leucothoe davisiae | Torr. ex A.Gray | 44 | documented |
| Leucothoe bahiensis | DC. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leucothoe cusickii | M.E.Jones | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leucothoe floribunda | (Pursh) D.Don | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leucothoe griffithiana | C.B.Clarke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leucothoe hirta | (Willd.) DC. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leucothoe ilicifolia | (Pers.) DC. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leucothoe intermedia | Meisn. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leucothoe katagherensis | DC. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leucothoe keiskei | Miq. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leucothoe laxiflora | Meisn. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leucothoe mariana | (L.) DC. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leucothoe martii | Meisn. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leucothoe myrsinefolia | A.Rich. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leucothoe rhomboidalis | A.Gray | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leucothoe secunda | DC. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leucothoe spicata | G.Don | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leucothoe subcanescens | (DC.) Meisn. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.