Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leskeodon acuminatus | (Bosch & Sande Lac.) M.Fleisch. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leskeodon andicola | (Spruce ex Mitt.) Broth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leskeodon aristatus | (Geh. & Hampe) Broth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leskeodon auratus | (Müll.Hal.) Broth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leskeodon brevicuspidatus | (E.B.Bartram) B.C.Tan & H.Rob. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leskeodon cubensis | (Mitt.) Thér. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leskeodon densiretis | (Broth.) Broth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leskeodon dussii | (Besch.) E.B.Bartram | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leskeodon longicaulis | Broth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leskeodon maibarae | (Besch.) B.C.Ho & L.Pokorny | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leskeodon minusculus | (Müll.Hal.) M.Fleisch. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leskeodon paisa | S.P.Churchill | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leskeodon palmarum | (Mitt.) Broth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leskeodon pandurifolius | M.Fleisch. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leskeodon parvifolius | E.B.Bartram | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leskeodon philippinensis | Broth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leskeodon ponapensis | H.A.Mill. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leskeodon seramensis | H.Akiyama | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leskeodon wallisii | (Müll.Hal.) Broth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.