Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leskea polycarpa | Hedw. | 73 | documented |
| Leskea gracilescens | Hedw. | 17 | documented |
| Leskea australis | Sharp | 4 | documented |
| Leskea acuminata | Broth. & Paris | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leskea catenularia | (Müll.Hal.) Broth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leskea consanguinea | (Mont.) Mitt. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leskea delicatula | Sw. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leskea filaria | Broth. ex Ihsiba | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leskea filivaga | (Müll.Hal.) Broth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leskea guineensis | Paris & Broth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leskea hyloapiculata | Dixon | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leskea integra | P.Beauv. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leskea latifolia | Lindb. ex Broth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leskea mauritiana | Besch. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leskea obscura | Hedw. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leskea perstricta | Dixon | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leskea plumaria | Mitt. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leskea polenburgii | Łobarz. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leskea riparia | Hampe | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leskea scabrinervis | Broth. & Paris | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leskea schiedeana | Hampe | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leskea subacuminata | Nog. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leskea subfiliramea | Broth. & Paris | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leskea sublaevifolia | Herzog | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leskea vaucheri | Schimp. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.