Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leptoderris aurantiaca | Dunn | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leptoderris brachyptera | (Benth.) Dunn | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leptoderris burundiensis | Bamps & Champl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leptoderris congolensis | (De Wild.) Dunn | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leptoderris coriacea | De Wild. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leptoderris cyclocarpa | Dunn | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leptoderris fasciculata | (Benth.) Dunn | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leptoderris gabonica | Breteler | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leptoderris glabrata | (Welw. ex Baker) Dunn | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leptoderris harmsiana | Dunn | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leptoderris hypargyrea | Dunn | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leptoderris ledermannii | Harms | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leptoderris macrothyrsa | Dunn | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leptoderris micrantha | Dunn | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leptoderris miegei | Aké Assi & Mangenot | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leptoderris nobilis | (Welw. ex Baker) Dunn | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leptoderris oxytropis | Harms | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leptoderris reygaertii | De Wild. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leptoderris robusta | Breteler | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leptoderris sassandrensis | Jongkind | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leptoderris tomentella | Harms | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Leptoderris trifoliolata | Hepper | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.