Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lepidolejeunea auriculata | Schäf.-Verw. & Heinrichs | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lepidolejeunea bidentula | (Steph.) R.M.Schust. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lepidolejeunea cordifissa | (Taylor) M.E.Reiner | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lepidolejeunea cuspidata | (Gottsche) Heinrichs & Schäf.-Verw. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lepidolejeunea delessertii | (Nees & Mont.) Grolle | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lepidolejeunea eluta | (Nees) R.M.Schust. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lepidolejeunea falcata | (Herzog) R.M.Schust. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lepidolejeunea graeffei | (J.B.Jack & Steph.) R.M.Schust. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lepidolejeunea grandiocellata | Schäf.-Verw., Bechteler, van Melick, M.A.M.Renner & Heinrichs | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lepidolejeunea grossepapulosa | (Steph.) Piippo | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lepidolejeunea integristipula | (J.B.Jack & Steph.) R.M.Schust. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lepidolejeunea involuta | (Gottsche) Grolle | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lepidolejeunea longilobula | (Amakawa) X.L.He | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lepidolejeunea novae-caledoniae | (Piippo) R.L.Zhu & Frank Müll. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lepidolejeunea serrulata | (Steph.) Grolle | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lepidolejeunea sullivantii | (Gottsche) M.E.Reiner | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.