Leonurus

Accepted species 24 Documented here 7 Family Lamiaceae

Accepted species 24 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Leonurus cardiaca L. 1,973 documented
Leonurus quinquelobatus Gilib. 1,017 documented
Leonurus japonicus Houtt. 144 documented
Leonurus glaucescens Bunge 42 documented
Leonurus tataricus L. 18 documented
Leonurus sibiricus L. 15 documented
Leonurus deminutus V.I.Krecz. 3 documented
Leonurus chaituroides C.Y.Wu & H.W.Li 0 below the evidence gate
Leonurus incanus V.I.Krecz. & Kuprian. 0 below the evidence gate
Leonurus kuprijanoviae Krestovsk. 0 below the evidence gate
Leonurus macranthus Maxim. 0 below the evidence gate
Leonurus mongolicus V.I.Krecz. & Kuprian. 0 below the evidence gate
Leonurus nuristanicus Murata 0 below the evidence gate
Leonurus panzerioides Popov 0 below the evidence gate
Leonurus persicus Boiss. 0 below the evidence gate
Leonurus pseudomacranthus Kitag. 0 below the evidence gate
Leonurus pseudopanzerioides Krestovsk. 0 below the evidence gate
Leonurus pubescens Benth. 0 below the evidence gate
Leonurus royleanus Benth. 0 below the evidence gate
Leonurus tibeticus Krestovsk. 0 below the evidence gate
Leonurus turkestanicus V.I.Krecz. & Kuprian. 0 below the evidence gate
Leonurus urticifolius C.Y.Wu & H.W.Li 0 below the evidence gate
Leonurus villosissimus C.Y.Wu & H.W.Li 0 below the evidence gate
Leonurus wutaishanicus C.Y.Wu & H.W.Li 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.