Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lazarum brownii | (Schott) M.D.Barrett | 5 | documented |
| Lazarum alismifolium | (F.Muell.) M.D.Barrett, A.Hay & Hett. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lazarum angustilobum | (F.Muell.) M.D.Barrett, A.Hay & Hett. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lazarum cochleare | (A.Hay) M.D.Barrett, A.Hay & Hett. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lazarum eliosurum | (F.Muell. ex Benth.) M.D.Barrett, A.Hay & Hett. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lazarum johnsonianum | (A.Hay & S.Taylor) M.D.Barrett, A.Hay & Hett. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lazarum jonesii | (A.Hay) M.D.Barrett, A.Hay & Hett. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lazarum liliifolium | (F.Muell.) M.D.Barrett, A.Hay & Hett. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lazarum mirabile | A.Hay | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lazarum nudibaccatum | (A.Hay) M.D.Barrett, A.Hay & Hett. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lazarum peltandroides | (A.Hay, M.D.Barrett & R.L.Barrett) M.D.Barrett, A.Hay & Hett. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lazarum praetermissum | (A.Hay) M.D.Barrett, A.Hay & Hett. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lazarum russell-smithii | (A.Hay) M.D.Barrett, A.Hay & Hett. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lazarum taylorii | (A.Hay) M.D.Barrett, A.Hay & Hett. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lazarum weipanum | (A.Hay) M.D.Barrett, A.Hay & Hett. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lazarum wilbertii | (A.Hay) M.D.Barrett, A.Hay & Hett. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.