Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lastreopsis hispida | (Sw.) Tindale | 292 | documented |
| Lastreopsis velutina | (A.Rich.) Tindale | 61 | documented |
| Lastreopsis tenera | (R.Br.) Tindale | 17 | documented |
| Lastreopsis marginans | (F.Muell.) D.A.Sm. & Tindale ex Tindale | 8 | documented |
| Lastreopsis silvestris | D.A.Sm. ex Tindale | 5 | documented |
| Lastreopsis decomposita | (R.Br.) Tindale | 3 | documented |
| Lastreopsis subsericea | (Mett.) Tindale | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Lastreopsis abscondita | Perrie & Amice | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lastreopsis amplissima | (C.Presl) Tindale | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lastreopsis davalliiformis | (Tardieu) Tardieu | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lastreopsis davallioides | (Brack.) Tindale | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lastreopsis dissecta | (C.T.White & Goy) Labiak, Sundue & R.C.Moran | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lastreopsis killipii | (C.Chr. & Maxon) Tindale | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lastreopsis nephrodioides | (Baker) Tindale | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lastreopsis poecilophlebia | (Hook.) Labiak, Sundue & R.C.Moran | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lastreopsis subrecedens | Ching | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lastreopsis subsparsa | (Alderw.) Tindale | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lastreopsis tripinnata | (F.Muell. ex Benth.) Labiak, Sundue & R.C.Moran | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lastreopsis vieillardii | (Mett.) Tindale | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lastreopsis walleri | Tindale | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Lastreopsis wurunuran | (Domin) Tindale | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.