Lasiopetalum

Accepted species 54 Documented here 10 Family Malvaceae

Accepted species 54 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Lasiopetalum parviflorum Rudge 48 documented
Lasiopetalum ferrugineum Sm. 34 documented
Lasiopetalum macrophyllum Graham 26 documented
Lasiopetalum discolor Hook. 23 documented
Lasiopetalum schulzenii (F.Muell.) Benth. 18 documented
Lasiopetalum behrii F.Muell. 17 documented
Lasiopetalum baueri Steetz 10 documented
Lasiopetalum floribundum 6 documented
Lasiopetalum bracteatum (Endl.) Benth. 4 documented
Lasiopetalum rufum R.Br. ex Benth. 3 documented
Lasiopetalum drummondii Benth. 3 below the evidence gate
Lasiopetalum micranthum Hook.f. 2 below the evidence gate
Lasiopetalum adenotrichum R.A.Meissn. & Rathbone 0 below the evidence gate
Lasiopetalum angustifolium W.Fitzg. 0 below the evidence gate
Lasiopetalum biloculatum K.A.Sheph. & C.F.Wilkins 0 below the evidence gate
Lasiopetalum cardiophyllum Paust 0 below the evidence gate
Lasiopetalum caroliae K.A.Sheph. 0 below the evidence gate
Lasiopetalum cenobium K.A.Sheph. & C.F.Wilkins 0 below the evidence gate
Lasiopetalum compactum Paust 0 below the evidence gate
Lasiopetalum cordifolium Endl. 0 below the evidence gate
Lasiopetalum decoratum K.A.Sheph. & C.F.Wilkins 0 below the evidence gate
Lasiopetalum dielsii E.Pritz. 0 below the evidence gate
Lasiopetalum erectifolium K.A.Sheph. & C.F.Wilkins 0 below the evidence gate
Lasiopetalum ferraricollinum E.M.Benn. & K.A.Sheph. 0 below the evidence gate
Lasiopetalum fitzgibbonii F.Muell. 0 below the evidence gate
Lasiopetalum glabratum Paust 0 below the evidence gate
Lasiopetalum glutinosum (Lindl.) F.Muell. 0 below the evidence gate
Lasiopetalum hapalocalyx K.A.Sheph. & C.F.Wilkins 0 below the evidence gate
Lasiopetalum indutum Steud. 0 below the evidence gate
Lasiopetalum joyceae Blakely 0 below the evidence gate
Lasiopetalum laxiflorum F.Muell. 0 below the evidence gate
Lasiopetalum lineare Paust 0 below the evidence gate
Lasiopetalum longistamineum Maiden & Betche 0 below the evidence gate
Lasiopetalum maxwellii F.Muell. 0 below the evidence gate
Lasiopetalum membranaceum (Steud.) Benth. 0 below the evidence gate
Lasiopetalum membraniflorum F.Muell. 0 below the evidence gate
Lasiopetalum microcardium E.Pritz. 0 below the evidence gate
Lasiopetalum molle Benth. 0 below the evidence gate
Lasiopetalum monticola Paust 0 below the evidence gate
Lasiopetalum moullean K.A.Sheph. & C.F.Wilkins 0 below the evidence gate
Lasiopetalum occidentale K.A.Sheph. & C.F.Wilkins 0 below the evidence gate
Lasiopetalum ogilvieanum F.Muell. 0 below the evidence gate
Lasiopetalum oldfieldii F.Muell. 0 below the evidence gate
Lasiopetalum oppositifolium F.Muell. 0 below the evidence gate
Lasiopetalum parvuliflorum F.Muell. 0 below the evidence gate
Lasiopetalum pterocarpum E.M.Benn. & K.A.Sheph. 0 below the evidence gate
Lasiopetalum quinquenervium Turcz. 0 below the evidence gate
Lasiopetalum rosmarinifolium (Turcz.) Benth. 0 below the evidence gate
Lasiopetalum rotundifolium Paust 0 below the evidence gate
Lasiopetalum rupicola K.A.Sheph. & C.F.Wilkins 0 below the evidence gate
Lasiopetalum rutilans K.A.Sheph. & C.F.Wilkins 0 below the evidence gate
Lasiopetalum tepperi F.Muell. 0 below the evidence gate
Lasiopetalum trichantherum K.A.Sheph. & C.F.Wilkins 0 below the evidence gate
Lasiopetalum venustum K.A.Sheph. & C.F.Wilkins 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.