Lanonia

Accepted species 19 Documented here 0 Family Arecaceae

Accepted species 19 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Lanonia acaulis (A.J.Hend., N.K.Ban & N.Q.Dung) A.J.Hend. & C.D.Bacon 0 below the evidence gate
Lanonia batoensis A.J.Hend. & N.Q.Dung 0 below the evidence gate
Lanonia calciphila (Becc.) A.J.Hend. & C.D.Bacon 0 below the evidence gate
Lanonia centralis (A.J.Hend., N.K.Ban & N.Q.Dung) A.J.Hend. & C.D.Bacon 0 below the evidence gate
Lanonia dasyantha (Burret) A.J.Hend. & C.D.Bacon 0 below the evidence gate
Lanonia gialaiensis A.J.Hend. & N.Q.Dung 0 below the evidence gate
Lanonia gracilis (Blume) A.J.Hend. & C.D.Bacon 0 below the evidence gate
Lanonia hainanensis (A.J.Hend., L.X.Guo & Barfod) A.J.Hend. & C.D.Bacon 0 below the evidence gate
Lanonia hexasepala (Gagnep.) A.J.Hend. & C.D.Bacon 0 below the evidence gate
Lanonia honbaensis A.J.Hend. & N.Q.Dung 0 below the evidence gate
Lanonia honheoensis A.J.Hend. & N.Q.Dung 0 below the evidence gate
Lanonia kontumensis A.J.Hend. & N.Q.Dung 0 below the evidence gate
Lanonia magalonii (A.J.Hend., N.K.Ban & N.Q.Dung) A.J.Hend. & C.D.Bacon 0 below the evidence gate
Lanonia manglaensis (A.J.Hend., N.K.Ban & N.Q.Dung) A.J.Hend. & N.Q.Dung 0 below the evidence gate
Lanonia montana A.J.Hend. & N.Q.Dung 0 below the evidence gate
Lanonia nuichuaensis A.J.Hend. & N.Q.Dung 0 below the evidence gate
Lanonia poilanei A.J.Hend. & N.Q.Dung 0 below the evidence gate
Lanonia tenuisecta A.J.Hend. & N.Q.Dung 0 below the evidence gate
Lanonia verrucosa A.J.Hend. & N.Q.Dung 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.