Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Labourdonnaisia ambrensis | (Aubrév.) L.Gaut. & Randriarisoa | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Labourdonnaisia calophylloides | Bojer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Labourdonnaisia glauca | Boj | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Labourdonnaisia glutinosa | (Aubrév.) L.Gaut. & Randriarisoa | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Labourdonnaisia hexandra | Lecomte | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Labourdonnaisia laciniata | (Lecomte) L.Gaut. & Randriarisoa | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Labourdonnaisia lecomtei | Aubrév. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Labourdonnaisia longepedicellata | (Aubrév.) L.Gaut. & Randriarisoa | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Labourdonnaisia madagascariensis | Pierre ex Baill. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Labourdonnaisia manongarivensis | (Aubrév.) L.Gaut. & Randriarisoa | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Labourdonnaisia parvifolia | (Lecomte) L.Gaut. & Randriarisoa | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Labourdonnaisia revoluta | Bojer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Labourdonnaisia richardiana | Pierre ex Aubrév. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Labourdonnaisia sambiranensis | (Aubrév.) L.Gaut. & Randriarisoa | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Labourdonnaisia tampoloensis | (Aubrév.) L.Gaut. & Randriarisoa | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Labourdonnaisia thouarsii | Pierre ex Dubard | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Labourdonnaisia thouvenotii | (Lecomte) L.Gaut. & Randriarisoa | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Labourdonnaisia urschii | (Aubrév.) L.Gaut. & Randriarisoa | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.