Kopsia

Accepted species 24 Documented here 0 Family Apocynaceae

Accepted species 24 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Kopsia fruticosa (Roxb.) A.DC. 2 below the evidence gate
Kopsia angustipetala Kerr 0 below the evidence gate
Kopsia arborea Blume 0 below the evidence gate
Kopsia dasyrachis Ridl. 0 below the evidence gate
Kopsia deverrei L.Allorge 0 below the evidence gate
Kopsia flavida Blume 0 below the evidence gate
Kopsia grandifolia D.J.Middleton 0 below the evidence gate
Kopsia griffithii King & Gamble 0 below the evidence gate
Kopsia hainanensis Tsiang 0 below the evidence gate
Kopsia harmandiana Pierre & Pit. 0 below the evidence gate
Kopsia lapidilecta Sleesen 0 below the evidence gate
Kopsia larutensis King & Gamble 0 below the evidence gate
Kopsia macrophylla Hook.f. 0 below the evidence gate
Kopsia pauciflora Hook.f. 0 below the evidence gate
Kopsia profunda Markgr. 0 below the evidence gate
Kopsia rajangensis D.J.Middleton 0 below the evidence gate
Kopsia rosea D.J.Middleton 0 below the evidence gate
Kopsia singapurensis Ridl. 0 below the evidence gate
Kopsia sleeseniana Markgr. 0 below the evidence gate
Kopsia sumatrana D.J.Middleton 0 below the evidence gate
Kopsia tenuis Leenh. & Steenis 0 below the evidence gate
Kopsia teoi L.Allorge 0 below the evidence gate
Kopsia tonkinensis Pit. 0 below the evidence gate
Kopsia vidalii D.J.Middleton 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.