Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Karwinskia humboldtiana | (Schult.) Zucc. | 200 | documented |
| Karwinskia calderonii | Standl. | 6 | documented |
| Karwinskia parvifolia | Rose | 5 | documented |
| Karwinskia subcordata | Schltdl. | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Karwinskia latifolia | Standl. | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Karwinskia angustata | Borhidi & O.Muñiz | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Karwinskia bicolor | (Britton & P.Wilson) Urb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Karwinskia caloneura | Urb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Karwinskia colombiana | Dugand & M.C.Johnst. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Karwinskia johnstonii | R.Fernández | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Karwinskia microphylla | Suess. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Karwinskia mollis | Schltdl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Karwinskia oblongifolia | (Britton & P.Wilson) Urb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Karwinskia orbiculata | (Britton & P.Wilson) Urb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Karwinskia pluvialis | A.Pool | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Karwinskia potrerilloana | (Borhidi & O.Muñiz) Borhidi | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Karwinskia rocana | (Britton & P.Wilson) Urb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Karwinskia rzedowskii | R.Fernández | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Karwinskia sessilifolia | Schltdl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Karwinskia tehuacana | R.Fernández & N.Waksman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Karwinskia umbellata | (Cav.) Schltdl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Karwinskia venturae | R.Fernández | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.