Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kallstroemia grandiflora | Torr. ex A.Gray | 214 | documented |
| Kallstroemia parviflora | Norton | 148 | documented |
| Kallstroemia maxima | (L.) Hook. & Arn. | 80 | documented |
| Kallstroemia peninsularis | D.M.Porter | 73 | documented |
| Kallstroemia californica | (S.Watson) Vail | 48 | documented |
| Kallstroemia rosei | Rydb. | 23 | documented |
| Kallstroemia tucumanensis | Descole, O'Donell & Lourteig | 8 | documented |
| Kallstroemia tribuloides | (Mart.) Steud. | 3 | documented |
| Kallstroemia tribuloides | Wight & Arn. | 3 | documented |
| Kallstroemia pubescens | (G.Don) Dandy | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Kallstroemia adscendens | (Andersson) B.L.Rob. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Kallstroemia boliviana | Standl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Kallstroemia curta | Rydb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Kallstroemia hageri | Rebman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Kallstroemia hintonii | D.M.Porter | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Kallstroemia hirsutissima | Vail | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Kallstroemia incana | Rydb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Kallstroemia mexicana | Hook. & Arn. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Kallstroemia pennellii | D.M.Porter | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Kallstroemia perennans | B.L.Turner | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Kallstroemia porteri | B.L.Turner | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Kallstroemia standleyi | D.M.Porter | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.