Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jacquinia keyensis | Mez | 49 | documented |
| Jacquinia arborea | Vahl | 3 | documented |
| Jacquinia armillaris | Jacq. | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Jacquinia aculeata | (L.) Mez | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Jacquinia acunana | Borhidi & O.Muñiz | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Jacquinia berteroi | Spreng. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Jacquinia clarendonensis | Stearn | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Jacquinia comosa | Urb. & Ekman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Jacquinia cristalensis | Lepper & J.E.Gut. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Jacquinia curvata | Lepper & J.E.Gut. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Jacquinia dichotoma | Urb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Jacquinia incrustata | Urb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Jacquinia macrantha | Urb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Jacquinia maisiana | Borhidi & O.Muñiz | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Jacquinia morenoana | Cast.-Campos & E.Medina | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Jacquinia obovata | Urb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Jacquinia proctorii | Stearn | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Jacquinia roigii | P.Wilson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Jacquinia sessiliflora | Alain | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Jacquinia toldensis | Lepper & J.E.Gut. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Jacquinia verticillaris | Urb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.